Mogadishu (Sunatimes) Consistent with his unfailing mission to speak for the best interest of
the failed, fragmented and powerless Somalia, Professor Michael Weinstein of Perdue
University, Indiana, USA has tried one more time to reason with the Somali
Elite and the International Community (donor/powers) about the main problem
hobbling the Provisional Federal Government (PFG) of Somalia as its
predecessors through his analysis published by GaroweOnlineon December 29, 2012. He eloquently explained the structural weaknesses-pull from
without and pull from within-, responsible for the PFG’s slow performance.
By adding the adjective “provisional” to the Federal Government’s name,
the professor reminds the Somalis that despite all rhetoric, in the eyes of the
international community, the present government isn’t different from the
previous transitional governments in legal, diplomatic and political terms. In
short, without defending the competence and integrity of PFG leaders, he underscored
that the donor-powers’ decision to starve the PFG, considered as a pull from
without, unless PFG leaders accept a
kind of Trusteeship Administration for the next 20 years, is more ominous for
the revival of Somalia than the pull from within (from dissatisfied Somali
factions).” Nevertheless, he restated that both forces are destructive.
The truth is that Somalia is trapped in servile or abusive international
relations in terms of foreign policy and diplomacy. Today’s role of Somalia’s
government is to rubber stamp the international decisions on Somalia to make foreign
domination palatable. The international photo-ops and red carpets granted to
the Somali leaders and the frequent three hour visits of foreign dignitaries to
Mogadishu mask the unequal power and foreign driven policies imposed on Somalia.
It’s hard to miss the contradictions between the public statement and the official
policy actions of donors and neighboring countries in dealing with the new government.
During his visit to Ethiopia in November 2012, President Hassan has
been informed to honor all deals concluded between Ethiopia and previous
transitional federal governments since Ethiopia’s intervention in Somalia is
not sanctioned by United Nations and African Union (AU) as part of AMISOM
forces. But in subsequent developments, Ethiopia, annoyed by the open door
policy of the new government, as usual, seems to have undertaken political,
diplomatic and military campaign to tarnish the credibility of the new
government and dispel the perception of political independence of Somalia.
Ethiopia wants to be the strategic gateway for Somalia.
Next, despite earlier confirmation of the visit
of President Hassan , the Kenyan government declined to welcome him hours
before his departure from Addis Ababa as gesture of pressure. The Kenyan government,
whose forces control large area of Somalia, could not believe that the president
of Somalia ignored Kenya’s wishes like its candidate for the Prime Minister’s
position or Jubbaland political dispensation.
As a result, western diplomats in Nairobi and European capitals rushed
immediately to Mogadishu to admonish the new government to listen and work with
Ethiopia and Kenya. The new government declared its determination to cooperate
with neighboring countries, AU and United Nations for furthering the mutual
interests of all.
After diplomatic shuttles, the Somali president received an invitation
for a one day official visit from President Muwai Kibaki of Kenya with the expectation
of endorsing the nine-point Draft
Communiqué published before the meeting of the two leaders. But, the
foreign minister of Kenya read out an eleven-point Official
Communiqué. I transcribe below some points of the two communiqués for
5. Underscored the need to
coordinate and cooperate both at the bilateral, regional and international
levels efforts geared towards consolidation of peace and security in Somalia
as well as reconstruction of the
country and building of new institutions of governance.
7. Commended the role of the Inter-Governmental Authority (IGAD) in the Grand Stabilization Plan for
South Central Somalia and other liberated areas and stressed the need to
support this process which has been endorsed by the IGAD Heads of State and
Government, the African Union and the UN Security Council
7. Commended the role of the Inter-Governmental Authority (IGAD) and
the support to IGAD by the African Union and the UN Security Council.
8. Noted with appreciation the role of AMISOM
in liberating large parts of Somalia from Al Shabab militants and called on
the United National Security Council (UNSC) to consider favourably the
extension of the mandate of AMISOM when it expires on 7th March,
2013, so that AMISOM can continue helping in the process of consolidation of
peace and security in Somalia.
9. Recalled the negative impact on the
sub-region of the breakdown of law and order in Somalia over the years and
acknowledged as legitimate the consensus
and interest of the sub-region in ensuring peace, security and stability
9. Agreed to relaunch and revitalize the Joint Commission as the
principal framework for cooperation in the security, cross
border issues, Economic Cooperation, Trade, Immigration, Education as well as
10. Underscored the vital importance of cooperating in the fight
against Al Shabab and other militant elements who are a threat to the
national security of both countries.
11. Agreed to establish a Joint Permanent Border Commission to deal
with Security and Cross border issues along the common border.
Point 5 requires the new government of Somalia to coordinate with the Kenyan
Government at bilateral, regional and international levels on all efforts
geared towards consolidation of peace, reconstruction and building of new
institutions of governance in Somalia. Implicitly point 5 covers the objectives
of the Grand Stabilization Plan for South Central Somalia deleted from point 7
of the official communiqué.
Point 8 of both communiqués supports the extension of the presence of AMISOM
forces in Somalia while it does not mention the urgently needed support for
funding the Somali security forces and the lifting of the arms embargo. The
official communiqué contains new points 9, 10, and 11 concerning a Joint Commission
for Cooperation (JCC) stipulated in 2005, cooperation in the fight against Al-Shabab
and other militant elements, and a Joint Permanent Border Commission. There is
no sufficient information about the 2005 agreement, the other militants and
border commission mentioned in these additional points.
The Foreign Ministry of Ethiopia’s comment on
the visit of President Hassan S. Mohamud to Kenya made extensive reference to
the draft communiqué instead of to the official communiqué, particularly
highlighting the Grand Stabilization Plan for South Central Somalia. This deliberate
misrepresentation indicates the kind of diplomatic ambushes the new government
faces in dealing with neighboring countries.
Sanaullah Baloch, UN Constitutional Advisor on Somalia, perhaps sensing
grudges from the neighboring countries suggests in his piece Somalia:
peace prospects of January 9, 2013 the following:
“The Somali leadership needs a visionary diplomatic approach to avoid
any sort of confrontation and competition with neighboring countries such as
Kenya, Ethiopia and Uganda, which have played a crucial role in the peace
process and peacekeeping.”
The British Government invited the Deputy Prime Minister, Foreign Minister
of Somalia Fawzia Yusuf Haji Aden and the Foreign Minister of Somaliland Dr.
Mohamed A. Omar. In his one paragraph statement, the UK Foreign Secretary William
Hague who met with Foreign Minister of Somalia said, “The foreign minister outlined
the Somali government’s plan to tackle the challenges ahead including improving
security, increasing access to justice, transparent financial management,
political reconciliation and economic development.”
The question is how the Somali government will implement that plan
without substantial financial assistance from donors? Mogadishu port revenue is
not sufficient to cover half of Mogadishu Local Government budget needs. All
international funds are channeled to UN Consolidated Appeal Process (CAP) of
$1.3 billion for 2013, to AU/AMISOM forces, to private security companies, and
to Ethiopian forces.
The UK Foreign and Commonwealth Office (CFO) website details information
about the two below mentioned policy initiatives (Assistance) dedicated to Somalia/Somaliland. These initiatives are components of
the UK National Security Strategy (NSS) and Building Stability Overseas
(1) Policy preventing conflict in
(2) Policy preventing and
reducing piracy off the coast of Somalia
The British Government leads a working group of the Contact Group on
Piracy off the Coast of Somalia focused on regional capacity development for the
prosecution of the captured pirates and military engagement against piracy.
Most of the funds allocated for the implementation of these policy initiatives are
transferred to UN and Non-Governmental organizations.
The UK Minister for Africa, Hon Mark Simmonds held talks with the
foreign Minister of Somaliland. Both parties agreed cooperation on terrorism,
piracy, economic development and continuation of the dialogue between Somalia
The new government of Somalia has severe limitations to deal
systematically, proactively and skillfully with the complex foreign policy issues
and the myriads of actors. It doesn’t have necessary institutional capacity,
integrity and independence to carry out foreign policy that supports domestic
policy goals. Some of the causes are:
·Absence of basic
institutional capacity at national level for carrying out policy and
diplomatic missions are either self-employed or guests (agents) paid by the
institutional memory and reliable documentation of international bilateral and
The new government of Somalia gains no benefits by working with
countless personalities and entities. The continuation of present chaotic and
manipulative interactions with the international community will inevitably result
the defenestration of the new government.
Donor-powers have predetermined their non-negotiable policy actions towards
Somalia. So to avoid haphazard diplomatic engagements which could jeopardize
Somalia’s sovereignty, territorial integrity, credibility and long term
stability, it is necessary a deep analysis of the core foreign policy issues and
diplomacy options that would help peacebuilding and statebuilding in Somalia. It
would be politically more sensible to adopt a streamlined framework of cooperation
with the international community.
Professor Michael Weinstein said loudly that “the political outcomes in
“Somalia” are not under the PFG’s control, but are the resultants of the play
between external actors, PFG and domestic factions.” It is the responsibility
of the Somali Government and Elite- particularly public intellectuals- to speak
and fight for the best outcomes which would promote first and foremost the
common interests of Somalia. Only patriots bequeath lasting positive legacy to
their people and country.